Kjell Arne Brudvik 0 Report post Posted December 29, 2020 It would be nice to have a way to determine a ruleset that could determine the quality of a person record, and it's different citations. E.g - a score from 0 to 100. Ranges: 0-20 = Poor quality 20-30 = Low quality 30-50 = Medium quality 50-80 = Good quality 80-90 = High quality 90-100 = Outstanding quality Example: Birth record (40) has been cited: Citation: Original church record for birth (90) Citation: Original church record for death (60) Citation: Original church record for confirmation (40) Citation: Toombstone (30) Citation: Living relative (80) Citation: Notes from relatives (20) Confirmation record (30) has been cited Citation: Original church record for confirmation (100) Death record (40) has been cited. Citation: Original church record for death (90) Citation: Toombstone (10) Toomstone record (30) has been cited. Marriage record (40) has been cited. Situations: Church record for birth + death = 90+60 = 150 - e.g. quality is at 100 (max) - high quality birth record entry. Toombstone + notes from relative = 30 + 20 = 50 - e.g. medium quality birth record entry. Notes only = 20 = poor quality birth record entry. No citations = poor quality birth record. Then, combine the different records - and have a overall score of that person profile. Situations: Person with a birth record score of 90 - would have a 90% score at birth record - e.g. 36 out of 40 - which would deem the total quality at medium quality. Person with a birth record score of 80 (e.g. 32), confirmation score of 100 (e.g. 30) and a death record score of 90% of death record (e.g. 36) - would have a total score of 98, which means outstanding quality. This is of course just ideas and thoughts - it would just be a helpful feature to make sure that all your records have at least some quality assurance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
manofmull 0 Report post Posted December 29, 2020 You can add reliability 1-3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites